Freedom website – Freedom Of Information http://freedom-of-information.info/ Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:39:26 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.3 https://freedom-of-information.info/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/favicon.png Freedom website – Freedom Of Information http://freedom-of-information.info/ 32 32 Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers and deeply awkward ‘satirist’ seek to remove 1st Amendment rights from website to ‘protect free speech’ https://freedom-of-information.info/rep-cathy-mcmorris-rodgers-and-deeply-awkward-satirist-seek-to-remove-1st-amendment-rights-from-website-to-protect-free-speech/ Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:25:00 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/rep-cathy-mcmorris-rodgers-and-deeply-awkward-satirist-seek-to-remove-1st-amendment-rights-from-website-to-protect-free-speech/ from it-doesn’t-seem-fair department Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who leads what’s called the “House Republican Big Tech Task Force,” teamed up with Seth Dillon, the CEO of deeply “conservative” wannabe Onion, The Babylon Bee, to whine in the NY Post about “how to end big tech’s censorship of free speech.“The answer, apparently, is to remove the […]]]>

from it-doesn’t-seem-fair department

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who leads what’s called the “House Republican Big Tech Task Force,” teamed up with Seth Dillon, the CEO of deeply “conservative” wannabe Onion, The Babylon Bee, to whine in the NY Post about “how to end big tech’s censorship of free speech.“The answer, apparently, is to remove the 1st Amendment. I would just like to joke, but that’s the crux of their very, very confusing suggestion.

Let’s start with the basics: Dillon’s site regularly publishes satires promoting a culture war. Because Republican culture wars these days are all about shitting on someone they don’t like, or who dares to suggest that simple respect for others is a virtue, many of these stories aren’t just deeply unfunny, but often quite screwed up. None of this is surprising, of course. But, the thing about the modern GOP and its culture wars is that it’s all about pretending to be the victim. It is never, not once, about being willing to take responsibility for your own actions.

So when Babylon Bee posts something stupid that breaks a rule, and they get a little slap on the wrist for it, they immediately collapse to the floor like a terrible football player and roll over how their freedom of expression was completely censored. . This is not the case. You are relying on someone else’s private property. They make the rules. And if they decide you’ve broken their rules, they can show you the door (or whatever punishment on the spot) they think is appropriate. It’s pretty basic stuff, and actually used to be Conservative dogma: Private property rights, the right to associate freely – or not – with whomever you want under the 1st Amendment, and to accept personal responsibility when messing around, were things that, did we -it is said, were essential to being conservative.

More (it’s debatable, of course, if they were really serious about all this).

There is no freedom of expression problem here. The Babylon Bee has the 1st Amendment right to publish all the nonsense it wants on its own site. He has no right to demand that others host his speech for him. Just like Babylon Bee needn’t publish my hysterically funny satire about Seth Dillon plagiarizing his “best” jokes by running Onion articles three times via GPT3 AI with the phrase “this, but for stupid rubies”. It’s freedom of association, Seth. This is how it works.

It’s perhaps no surprise that the CEO of a “what if satire was shitty” site doesn’t understand the 1st Amendment, but you’d think that a sitting member of Congress, who has actually sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution, might have a better idea. That’s not the case for Rep. McMorris Rodgers, who was once actually decent on tech, before apparently realizing that her constituents don’t like reality’s chosen ones and prefer them to be warriors as well. of the culture.

Anyway, after complaining about facing a tiny bit of personal responsibility – including, don’t shit, having to be fact checked by Facebook (note for both of you: fact-checking is more talkit’s not censorship, you hypocritical idiots) – they trot out their “solutions”.

Big Tech must be held accountable. First, we propose to narrow Section 230 liability protections for Big Tech companies by removing ambiguity from the law – which they exploit to suppress and penalize constitutionally protected speech. Our proposal ensures that Big Tech is no longer protected if it censors individuals or media or removes factually correct content simply because it doesn’t match its woke narrative.

I mean, damn it. There’s no excuse in the year 2022 to still ignore how Section 230 works so much. Especially if you’re in Congress. The narrowing of Section 230 liability protections will not lead to less restraint. It will lead to more. Liability protections are what make websites feel comfortable hosting third-party content. The case that caused Section 230 in the first place, involved Prodigy being held liable for comments in a forum. If you make the sites more accountable, they are less likely to host any nonsensical content you want to share their website.

Second, the removal of “factually correct content,” whether or not it “fits its woke narrative” (and, uh, no big tech company has a “wake narrative”) is…protected by the 1st Amendment. Content moderation is protected by the 1st Amendment. Dillon doesn’t have to publish my unfunny article. Twitter doesn’t need to publish its unfunny article. Facebook can verify anything it wants, even if it gets the facts wrong. It’s thanks to the 1st Amendment.

Removing 230 protections doesn’t change that – it makes websites even LESS likely to host culture war nonsense.

But McMorris Rodgers and Dillon aren’t done yet.

Second, we propose requiring quarterly filings with the Federal Trade Commission to keep Big Tech transparent about content moderation. This will allow Congress, the FTC, and Americans to know when and why these companies are censoring content to determine if it is warranted. We would also remove Section 230 protections after five years, so that Congress can reevaluate them if necessary and incentivize Big Tech to treat all content fairly or have their protections revoked.

Again, this is almost certainly unconstitutional. I know some people have a hard time understanding why the transparency requirements are an affront to the 1st Amendment, but it’s pretty simple. If Congress ordered Seth Dillon to file his site’s editorial policies, including details about which stories they reject and which ones they promote “to determine whether the site is justified” in making those editorial decisions, just about everyone would recognize the concerns of the 1st Amendment.

Require anyone to justify their editorial decisions by filing reports with the government to “determine whether [those editorial decisions are] Justified” is just a blatant attack on free speech and the 1st Amendment.

The Article 230 sunset simply brings us back to the problem we noted above. Without liability protections, websites are MORE likely to remove content to avoid liability, not less.

It’s not like a big secret. Maybe Dillon and McMorris Rodgers only get their news from sites like Babylon Bee, and that helps them not understand how it all works. But, really, that’s no excuse.

Third, our proposal demands that Big Tech improve appeal processes for users to challenge moderation decisions and allow people to ask their state’s Attorney General to take legal action against Big Tech, thereby strengthening the power users to challenge censorship. Twitter would be required to notify a user, such as Babylon Bee, via direct communication before taking any censorship action. Big Tech would also be required to give users the ability to challenge any censorship decisions with a real person — not a bot — to dissuade Big Tech from completely automating its censorship process.

Well, again, this is all an affront to the 1st Amendment. Should I be able to get my state’s Attorney General to take legal action against Babylon Bee for not posting my truly hilarious article about how Cathy McMorris Rodgers hates the internet so much, that she uttered a legislation prohibiting communities from building their own broadband networks (really fun stuff, because it’s true).

Of course not. The 1st Amendment protects websites and their editorial decisions. There is no constitutional cause of action that an Attorney General could bring against a website for its moderation decisions.

As for the appeal process, most websites have one. But mandating one would, again, raise serious constitutional issues, because it is the government that interferes with the editorial process.

And, note, of course, that none of these complaints are about the fact that the social media sites people love Dillon Asincluding Parler, Gettr, and Truth Social, have much more arbitrary and aggressive content moderation policies (even though they claim otherwise).

It will be hilarious — even Babylon Bee-worthy, if I say so myself — if this bill passes and woke liberals use it to sue Truth Social for suppressing truthful content from the January 6 hearings. Come on, Seth, let me publish this as an article on your site! Or do you hate freedom of expression!

Freedom of expression should be cherished and preserved. It’s time for Big Tech companies to uphold American values ​​and become fair stewards of the discourse they host.

But the Babylon Bee is still free to be as shitty as before? How is that fair?

Filed Under: 1st amendment, cathy mcmorris rodgers, content moderation, editorial discretion, freedom of speech, section 230, seth dillon

Companies: babylon bee

]]>
Now Deleted Plath Family Website Discovered And Roasted By Fans https://freedom-of-information.info/now-deleted-plath-family-website-discovered-and-roasted-by-fans/ Sun, 07 Aug 2022 20:03:00 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/now-deleted-plath-family-website-discovered-and-roasted-by-fans/ Fans are roasting a now-deleted Welcome to Plathville website, where personal stories, biographies and photos of each family member have been shared. On the main site of Welcome to Plathville, fans can see posts about various actors. The Plath family is known to be a strict household that limits technology and unhealthy foods, like sugar, […]]]>

Fans are roasting a now-deleted Welcome to Plathville website, where personal stories, biographies and photos of each family member have been shared.

On the main site of Welcome to Plathville, fans can see posts about various actors. The Plath family is known to be a strict household that limits technology and unhealthy foods, like sugar, while encouraging traditional values. The show focuses on the conflict between family members as many children attempt to navigate their lives in a new environment.

In the Plath family, children and parents seem to be on different pages when it comes to how to express themselves. Many viewers have been unhappy with Kim Plath, as she is often seen manipulating her children into acting in her best interest. Many children, including Ethan Plath, became estranged from the family because of this behavior. Others felt that their emotions are not taken into account. Some children felt limited by their parents’ strict expectations. Recently, Kim and Barry Plath went through a divorce, which upset many family members.

VIDEO OF THE DAY

Related: Why Welcome To Plathville Micah & Moriah Are Tired Of Olivia’s Outbursts

On a recently discovered deleted website, each family member had a page describing their personal stories. It included hobbies, businesses, and stories about childhood. It is assumed that Kim created the website, as she owns the copyright. Fans commented on Kim’s involvement with the website on a Reddit thread created by @LilPoobles. Some commented that Kim cared too much about public opinion. They think this website is an example of her forcing her family to participate in activities she doesn’t want to participate in. It was noted that Kim was the first person to want to start filming Welcome to Plathvillebut everyone refused.



Kim Plath

On the deleted website, Kim opened up about the tragic death of her son Joshua, aged 17 months. Kim’s biography also hints at how the family works. Apparently, Kim’s mother taught her the importance of a healthy lifestyle. Many believe this led to her wanting to control her children’s diet, activities and appearance. Some argued that Kim restricted her children’s habits but did not follow her own expectations. It has been said that Kim Plath has created a victim narrative for herself within the family as she frequently portrays her children as rebels and bad influences. However, many believe that the children took care of each other.


Still, viewers hope kids can gain more freedom to make their own choices. Many were unhappy with the way children were portrayed, as some seem to be favored over others on the website. Fans were uncomfortable with what children were encouraged to do as well as how they were perceived by the author of the website. Regardless of that, viewers hope the Welcome to Plathville the family is able to gain more freedom and be accepted by each other.

Next: All The Clues That Welcome Plathville’s Kim And Barry May Reconcile

Source: @LilPoobles/reddit

Miona Bell 90 Day Fiance Split Image with Jibri

90 Day Fiancé: Fans Ask About Miona and Jibri’s Financial Situation


About the Author

]]>
Connecticut launches reproductive rights hotline and website https://freedom-of-information.info/connecticut-launches-reproductive-rights-hotline-and-website/ Fri, 05 Aug 2022 13:29:22 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/connecticut-launches-reproductive-rights-hotline-and-website/ HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) – State leaders have announced a reproductive rights hotline and website that they say will make it easier for people seeking information about abortion care in Connecticut . This comes after the United States Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade in June, eliminating the nearly 50-year-old constitutional right to abortion […]]]>

HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) – State leaders have announced a reproductive rights hotline and website that they say will make it easier for people seeking information about abortion care in Connecticut .

This comes after the United States Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade in June, eliminating the nearly 50-year-old constitutional right to abortion and giving states the power to dramatically limit or ban the procedure.

“To women across America who need reproductive health care: come to Connecticut,” Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz (D-Conn) said at a news conference Friday.

People can now call 1-866-CTCHOICE (1-866-282-4642) or visit portal.ct.gov/reproductiverights for Connecticut reproductive rights information, providers, and other resources.

This is a difficult and possibly dangerous time for those living in states that no longer offer choice.

“People make desperate choices in desperate times, and sometimes people make choices that aren’t always safe for their own health,” said Connecticut Department of Public Health Commissioner Manisha Juthani.

One of the problems with states that have banned abortion is that they have also criminalized it. They threaten to sue women who have abortions even if they come to states where it’s legal. At this time, Connecticut cannot guarantee that this will not happen to people who come here.

“We are trying to understand, not just in Connecticut but across the country, what our strategy is and how we are going to protect and defend patients, women, doctors, health care providers,” the attorney explained. General William Tong (D-Connecticut).

In May, Governor Ned Lamont signed into law Connecticut’s first major abortion law in years, the Reproductive Freedom Defense Act, aimed at legally protecting providers and patients from lawsuits outside of the state. State. The nation’s first law, which went into effect July 1, also allows advanced practice registered nurses, nurse midwives or physician assistants to perform vacuum aspiration abortions during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

The attorney general said he would be the first to sue if anyone tried to limit access to abortion in Connecticut. It’s all part of Connecticut as a safe state.

“We provide a full range of choices to our women and let them make the decision, not a politician standing between you and your doctor,” the Democratic governor said.

The hotline is operated by a state contractor trained to answer questions about abortion or direct callers to someone who can.

The states new website offers information in the following areas:

  • Understand your rights
  • Find a supplier
  • Pay for an abortion
  • Transportation and travel
  • Resources for Health Care Professionals and Providers
  • Community support
]]>
Sebastian Peter Cerra wrongful conviction website https://freedom-of-information.info/sebastian-peter-cerra-wrongful-conviction-website/ Wed, 03 Aug 2022 15:45:00 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/sebastian-peter-cerra-wrongful-conviction-website/ Supporters of a former Vernon man sentenced to life in prison for killing a Kelowna sex worker in 1998 have launched a website in a bid to win his freedom. Supporters of a former Vernon man sentenced to life in prison for killing a Kelowna sex worker in 1998 have launched a website in a […]]]>

Supporters of a former Vernon man sentenced to life in prison for killing a Kelowna sex worker in 1998 have launched a website in a bid to win his freedom.

Supporters of a former Vernon man sentenced to life in prison for killing a Kelowna sex worker in 1998 have launched a website in a bid to win his freedom.

His childhood friend Roderic Patton created the “miscarriage of justice” website, claiming that Sebastian Peter Cerra was wrongly convicted of second degree murder.

Cerra has been imprisoned for nearly 25 years and was denied an appeal of his sentence in 2004.

In 1999, Cerra was convicted of the death of 24-year-old Ruby Kirkpatrick on the side of Glenmore Road over an alleged drug dispute.

The website claims that “new evidence… proves that Mr. Sebastian Cerra was wrongly convicted of a murder he never committed”.

It says new DNA evidence points to other suspects and new eyewitness and crime scene evidence has been suppressed by Crown counsel and the RCMP “to the exclusion of other suspects”.

The site says the jury’s verdict “weighed entirely on inadmissible identifying evidence.”

He says the Crown’s “tunnel vision and extreme prejudicial determination for a conviction blindly resulted in a gross miscarriage of justice”.

Patton says the case “has many attributes that reflect the wrongful conviction case of (David) Milgaard.”

Milgaard was 16 when he was wrongly accused and convicted of the rape and murder of Saskatoon caregiver Gail Miller in 1969. He spent 23 years in prison until his release in 1992.

Patton says he hopes UBC’s Innocence Project will “address this gross and damaging wrongful conviction.”

“A commission on miscarriages of justice has been promised to the citizens of Canada by the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice. Based on all the new exculpatory evidence, it is clear that a newly formed commission must act to present this evidence. in court and reverse this wrongful conviction,” the site reads.

“A justice system that allows court officers and crown prosecutors to fabricate evidence and commit perjury … is guilty of conspiracy and contempt,” Cerra himself reportedly told the site.

“When judges are biased and trials are unfair, justice no longer exists.”

However, the Criminal Conviction Review Panel denied Cerra’s claims.

“The CCRG submits that this evidence is not new…After considering all relevant issues, we have come to the conclusion that your request does not contain any new and material information that would provide
a reasonable basis for concluding that a miscarriage of justice likely occurred in your case.”

]]>
Top Reasons to Implement Text-to-Speech on Your Website https://freedom-of-information.info/top-reasons-to-implement-text-to-speech-on-your-website/ Sun, 31 Jul 2022 04:29:33 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/top-reasons-to-implement-text-to-speech-on-your-website/ There are only a few conventional methods you can consider when considering a unique strategy to attract and retain new users to the website, such as generating more knowledgeable articles, creating captivating titles, and capturing readers’ attention with a fantastic first paragraph. While these are all great approaches to attracting new readers and getting your […]]]>

There are only a few conventional methods you can consider when considering a unique strategy to attract and retain new users to the website, such as generating more knowledgeable articles, creating captivating titles, and capturing readers’ attention with a fantastic first paragraph.

While these are all great approaches to attracting new readers and getting your website off the ground, you’ll need to go the extra mile to keep visitors engaged and deliver material to new audiences. Fortunately, you have text to talk integration to succeed in such a competitive digital world. Plus, it’s a simple and affordable approach to giving your website a refreshing touch.

Text-to-speech is not a new concept, but its use helps overcome the problems of distributing material to a diverse audience. Text-to-Speech technology gives every digital, media-independent item its own voice (app, blogs, websites, ebooks, articles, online documents). It is a great option for people who are blind or have difficulty reading. It should be noted that these are not the only advantages of speech synthesis technologies.

Here are some of the reasons why text-to-speech is beneficial for your website:

  1. Boosts engagement

Most bloggers and website owners struggle to increase readership and user interaction. This is due to the volume of information available on the Internet, which makes reading tedious. Also, the world has become so busy that many of us feel compelled to multi-task in order to get as much done as possible, even while reading.

Then there are those who can’t find enough time to read. Either way, integrating Text-to-Speech into your blog allows visitors to listen to your material on the road, while driving, doing chores, or even taking a shower. It also increases the possibility of visitors consuming your material.

  1. Reaches a global audience

In today’s globalized world, a business can cross borders and make more money, which emphasizes the need to cater to different types of people. Text-to-speech can reach a much wider audience than people who can read and write text proficiently.

The best text-to-speech online commands offer a simple approach to separating digital information for a variety of groups. About 244 million people were born abroad. Migrant households, especially those who do not speak the language, could benefit from read-aloud options.

  1. Removes the language barrier

Due to globalization, more and more social transactions can be recognized across borders, and the language barrier is one of the most serious difficulties present online. People learn new languages ​​and read a wide range of material.

Text-to-speech enables people to learn, develop their eloquence and articulation, and overcome language and dialect barriers. That’s why some of the best text-to-speech apps recognize over 100 languages, allowing people all over the world to benefit from this technology.

  1. Attracts podcast audiences

Many visitors need an audio channel to easily access your material due to the significant increase in audio listeners and improvements in audio technology over the past year. They won’t be able to appreciate it and absorb it properly until they do.

Including the text-to-speech feature on your website or blog will give you a unique opportunity to attract people who prefer to listen to the reading. Ultimately, you’ll provide ease, choice, and freedom to your readers.

  1. Ideal for the elderly

The elderly population is growing, necessitating the development of more adaptable technologies to give them access to media as well. We can improve accessibility for older people with such technologies, allowing them to participate in the media as well.

More and more phones are equipped with the “read-aloud” function, allowing users to easily navigate their small screens. Hand-eye coordination deteriorates with age. Technology like text-to-speech has the potential to change the way we use our electronic devices.

  1. Develops early learning

Children will benefit a lot from text to speech. Many young people have trouble concentrating and are quickly confused by long paragraphs and words. This technology helps in accurate word recognition.

The young person sees and hears everything at the same time, which helps them to remember things. This method encourages them to learn and memorize words. They begin to realize and correct their flaws.

  1. Bonus – Video creation with voiceover

You know how videos have transformed marketing campaigns. We believe that you too have developed this strategy on your website; if not, you should start, and if so, we have something special for you.

If you want to make the most of the digital world, you have to add voiceover to video. Voiceover increases your reach, which translates to higher website rankings and increased traffic.

Wrap

Important technology, such as text-to-speech, can improve people’s lives, but it must be implemented in a way that is simple and accessible to individuals, businesses, institutions and markets. Now you have a better understanding of TTS text-to-speech technology and how it can serve the industry and the general public for various purposes.

]]>
Is ‘Uninjected’ Dating Site for ‘Unvaccinated Covid-19’ Leaving Data Exposed? https://freedom-of-information.info/is-uninjected-dating-site-for-unvaccinated-covid-19-leaving-data-exposed/ Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:36:36 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/is-uninjected-dating-site-for-unvaccinated-covid-19-leaving-data-exposed/ According to its website, Unjected was “Created by two moms in Hawaii during the height of the … [+] deployment of the vaccine in the spring of 2021; Unjected is a multi-faceted platform of health-conscious covid-19 unvaccinated humans. (Photo: Getty) Getty If you are looking for love or other connections with “Covid-19 unvaccinated humans” on […]]]>

If you are looking for love or other connections with “Covid-19 unvaccinated humans” on the website, Not injected, could you leave yourself unprotected in more ways than one? You’ve probably heard that not being vaccinated can put you at increased risk of getting more severe Covid-19, based on a growing number of research studies summarized on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website. But Mikael Thalen writes for the daily item warned of other potential exposure that may result from use of the website, which may have involved your dating data.

In the following tweet thread, Thalen called Unjected “Tinder for anti-vaxxers” and described how website users can have their personal data erased:

Thalen then described how the daily item created a test account on the Unjected website and then witnessed how a web developer and system administrator named GeopJr was able to essentially hack into this test account and change its information:

Getting other people to change your profile picture, edit your posts, and change your username is obviously not a good thing. You wouldn’t want a random person to play with your dating profile to look like you don’t enjoy long walks on the beach at sunset. Or photograph a shirt on your shirtless body in your profile picture. Or change your username to something like “never out of pants”. GeopJr, who describes himself as a “CS student from Greece”, told the daily item that basic security protocols had been overlooked when creating the Unjected website. In other words, the premature release of the website may have left Unjected rather unprotected.

Thalen’s tweet thread continued with what happened after the daily item contacted Unjected co-founder Shelby Thomson about these vulnerabilities:

In the daily item article, Thalen wrote, “The most critical issue, user data exposure, has been fixed. Many non-critical bugs remain.

Now, it’s unclear how many actual humans might have been affected by the data exposure and might be at risk with these remaining bugs. The website claims it’s “grown to reach 110,000 and growing members in 85 different countries around the world.” Of course, when it comes to dating, the phrase “multiplying endlessly” can mean different things. And currently the website does not provide more data to verify their membership size.

What could someone join Unjected? Well, the website includes the following description of itself: “Created by two moms in Hawaii, during the height of the vaccine rollout in the spring of 2021; Unjected is a multi-faceted platform of health-conscious humans, unvaccinated against covid-19, who believe in medical freedom, freedom of choice, freedom of expression and bodily autonomy. According to the website, Unjected offers the following:

  • “Features to help you find love with mRNA-free partners.” Hmm, “without mRNA” is an interesting term. If you are human, every day your cells make many copies of mRNA (which is short for messenger ribonucleic acid) which contain instructions on how to build proteins from your cell nuclei to factors production of proteins in the cytoplasm of cells. So technically someone completely “mRNAless” would be dead, which wouldn’t make for a good relationship, personal or professional. So presumably “mRNA-free” in the case of the website specifically refers to someone who has not received one of the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. Keep in mind, however, that mRNA from Covid-19 vaccines does not stay in your body long after injection. Instead, our bodies break down this mRNA soon after it helps your cells make some of the spike proteins that normally stud the surface of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the make it look like a spiky massage ball.
  • Support for “Find friendships with those who truly understand ‘what’s really going on’.” That probably doesn’t mean people understand the song “What’s Going On”, sung by Marvin Gaye.
  • “Social feeds without fact checkers. Note that the website has put the word “without” in bold and italics. Because who wants the facts to be verified?
  • “The listings features make it easy to connect and do business with those who have always been out of office or find local artists and creatives to support your local unvaccinated community.” This way, you can identify companies that were unwilling to implement evidence-based means to protect the public. Because who would want to meddle with companies that are actually trying to protect the public.
  • “MRNA-Free Blood Repertoires and Fertility Repertoires to Protect Population Integrity.” OK, telling a potential date that you’re looking to “protect the integrity of the people” might not be the best opening line.

If all of these are screaming “Sign me up” at you but you’re low on funds, you’re apparently in luck. The website states that “Many of our services are free and usable”, although it is possible to join, “Unjected Premium for faster connection at only 11.11 USD with monthly and annual subscription options” .

Alternatively, if you want to keep your data private and fact-checked, you may want to be wary of websites that do not maintain at least basic security protocols and may make claims that are not supported by science and which actually contradicts the available information. scientific proof. SARS-CoV-2 is still spreading relatively unchecked with an average of 44,088 people hospitalized and 436 people dying each day from Covid-19 in the United States alone, according to the New York Times. There are also many hackers, viruses and other nasties online. Therefore, it is a good idea to protect your body and your data appropriately against viruses, whether biological or electronic.

]]>
Bosnia and Herzegovina news site eTrafika threatened with ‘bloodshed’ for reporting https://freedom-of-information.info/bosnia-and-herzegovina-news-site-etrafika-threatened-with-bloodshed-for-reporting/ Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:14:32 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/bosnia-and-herzegovina-news-site-etrafika-threatened-with-bloodshed-for-reporting/ Berlin, July 28, 2022 – Authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina should promptly and thoroughly investigate death threats against journalists on the independent news website eTrafika and ensure their safety, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Thursday. From May, Siniša Golub, a man who has already been the subject of eTrafikasent death threats and physical violence […]]]>

Berlin, July 28, 2022 – Authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina should promptly and thoroughly investigate death threats against journalists on the independent news website eTrafika and ensure their safety, the Committee to Protect Journalists said Thursday.

From May, Siniša Golub, a man who has already been the subject of eTrafikasent death threats and physical violence to journalists at the outlet, according to information from eTrafika and SafeJournalistsa regional news site that tracks violence against journalists, as well as eTrafika editor-in-chief Vanja Stokić, who communicated with CPJ via email.

In 2018, eTrafika published a article alleging that Golub operated on a dog at an illegal clinic without the proper veterinary credentials.

From May 4 to July 13, Golub sent seven messages to eTrafika’s official Facebook page, asking the media to delete this article, warning its journalists that it knew the location of eTrafika’s, and saying there would be a “bloodbath,” according to Stokić and screenshots reviewed by CPJ.

On July 20, the prosecutor’s office in Banja Luka, in the northwest of the country, where eTrafika at its headquarters, refused to open a criminal investigation because Golub sent the messages to the media’s institutional page, rather than to individual journalists, according to Stokić and SafeJournalists. However, following a July 21 statement by local press freedom groups calling on authorities to act, the office opened a criminal investigation on July 22, Stokić told CPJ.

“While we welcome the news that the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina are receiving death threats against journalists working for the news site eTrafika seriously, it’s troubling that they had to be pressured to open an investigation,” said CPJ Europe Representative Attila Mong. “Authorities must ensure that journalists at the outlet can work safely and show that repeated and increasingly violent threats against members of the press for doing their job will not go unpunished, especially when the author reveals himself openly.”

In this 2018 article, Golub said eTrafika that he had helped an injured dog and that he had graduated from veterinary school, although he admitted that he was not accredited as a veterinarian in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

In December 2021, Golub emailed eTrafika and asked them to remove the article because the report was false, Stokić told CPJ, adding that eTrafika refused his request and stood by his report, and did not hear from him again until May 2022.

“He might want to delete the article so it doesn’t show up in searches of his name,” Stokić said.

CPJ’s Facebook message to Golub and email to the Banja Luka prosecutor’s office received no response.

]]>
WordPress – Website Builder 20.3 APK brings new features and bug fix https://freedom-of-information.info/wordpress-website-builder-20-3-apk-brings-new-features-and-bug-fix/ Tue, 26 Jul 2022 18:20:47 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/wordpress-website-builder-20-3-apk-brings-new-features-and-bug-fix/ Who says you can only use the famous WordPress website builder from a laptop or desktop computer? Installing the mobile version of the app will also give you access to many useful features that you can use right from your phone. WordPress – Website Builder 20.3 APK is now up for grabs via APKMirror if […]]]>

Who says you can only use the famous WordPress website builder from a laptop or desktop computer? Installing the mobile version of the app will also give you access to many useful features that you can use right from your phone.

WordPress – Website Builder 20.3 APK is now up for grabs via APKMirror if your device has at least version 7.0 (Nougat, API 24) of the Android operating system installed. There you will find a unique download option based on a universal architecture that requires 106.76 MB of storage.

What’s new

WordPress – Website Builder 20.3 APK brings a nice set of improvements to make you more productive while using the app itself. There is also a small fix included for a bug that caused the app to crash when the user scrolled through posts containing Embed Blocks.

Here’s what’s new with Update 20.3:

  • You can add media from a link located in Video Blocks.
  • When you add a media library item to an image block, the item’s alt text is displayed.
  • Recover invalid or unexpected content in a block using the block recovery option.

If you want to know more about the WordPress application for mobile devices, feel free to check out a description that appears in the Google Play Store:

WordPress is an open-source website builder, which means anyone can see how it’s made and even contribute to it. Other services and social networks are proprietary and closed systems; you can never know exactly how they work or what they do — and they can disappear!

Whether you need a website builder to create your website or just a blog builder, WordPress can help. It gives you great designs, powerful features, and the freedom to build whatever you want.

Did you know that WordPress powers over 14% of the top websites in the world?

]]>
British women face new threats to their bodily autonomy https://freedom-of-information.info/british-women-face-new-threats-to-their-bodily-autonomy/ Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:58:33 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/british-women-face-new-threats-to-their-bodily-autonomy/ Concerns have been raised over the UK government’s quiet removal of abortion and sexual health rights commitments from an international covenant on freedom of belief and gender equality. In the aftermath of the rollback of reproductive rights in the United States, British activists have raised concerns about the state of abortion laws in their own […]]]>

Concerns have been raised over the UK government’s quiet removal of abortion and sexual health rights commitments from an international covenant on freedom of belief and gender equality.

In the aftermath of the rollback of reproductive rights in the United States, British activists have raised concerns about the state of abortion laws in their own country.

Until now, the procedure has been widely accessible, despite its legal status more precarious than many think.

This is largely thanks to section 9 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which emphasizes freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) – including in relation to his own body.

Yet, while this year’s International Ministerial Conference urge increased global action protecting and promoting FoRB for all was underway, the UK government was quietly removing commitments to abortion and sexual health rights from an official gender equality statement signed by 22 countries.

According Humanists United Kingdomthe charity responsible for first identifying the gap, references to repealing discriminatory laws that threaten women’s bodily autonomy can no longer be found on the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) website .

Now, with any mention of such pledges removed entirely, only six countries have signed the declaration: the UK, Greece, Ukraine, Italy, Slovenia and Malta. The latter – who owns one of the the strictest abortion policies in the world – chose to do so only after modification.

In its defense, the FCDO called it an attempt to “resolve a perceived ambiguity in the wording,” stressing that it remains committed to maintaining universal access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health rights ( SRHR).

It failed to quell worry, all the more following the recent overthrow of Roe V Wade.

“I think the amendment reflects a disturbing trend behind the scenes of government to trade in women’s human rights because there is no ambiguity either you are committing to them or you are not.” , says the Labor MP, Stella Ceasy.

“The original statement makes a very clear commitment to sexual and reproductive health and rights, bodily autonomy and other laws, and recognizes them as a source of discrimination. The modified version does not.

In short, given that the purpose of the original declaration was to recognize the need to support the FoRB without allowing it to come at the expense of the human rights of women and girls, by removing the language, not only is its effect gravely compromise, but it suggests that religion trumps human rights.

]]>
Squarespace launches Fluid Engine, a next-gen web design system https://freedom-of-information.info/squarespace-launches-fluid-engine-a-next-gen-web-design-system/ Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:00:00 +0000 https://freedom-of-information.info/squarespace-launches-fluid-engine-a-next-gen-web-design-system/ With Fluid Engine, clients unlock what we call unbreakable creativity – the ability to push the creative boundaries of web design with confidence. The redesigned design system gives users maximum freedom to play, experiment, and easily push the boundaries of creation with an unrestricted canvas, but the canvas is also guided by an advanced smart […]]]>

With Fluid Engine, clients unlock what we call unbreakable creativity – the ability to push the creative boundaries of web design with confidence. The redesigned design system gives users maximum freedom to play, experiment, and easily push the boundaries of creation with an unrestricted canvas, but the canvas is also guided by an advanced smart grid to ensure quality results. The system provides just enough design guidance to make a website look great without limiting creativity. With a highly intuitive, smooth, and agile website editing experience, anyone, whether beginner or pro, can achieve unique, professional design results that help them stand out and succeed online. . It’s powerful enough to be used by the most creative web design professionals, yet easy to use for beginners.

Main characteristics:

Fluid Engine delivers breakthrough web design with an array of new features and customization options, including:

  • Easier customization and creative expression. A modern design system that gives users creative freedom and flexibility with design guidance via an advanced drag-and-drop smart grid.
  • Placement accuracy. A new level of control when organizing content in layouts. You can control all aspects of layering, alignment, full-bleed positioning, and more.
  • More control over your mobile website. An intelligent network specially designed for mobile display that helps users create bespoke designs to optimize the mobile experience.
  • Design efficiency. Smart and responsive functionality to help users achieve intended design results faster and easier.

With a growing share of global mobile traffic, better mobile website design and experience have a significant impact on increased visitor trust, credibility and engagement, which translates into more sales and success. on line. Recognizing the need for customizable mobile experiences, Fluid Engine makes it easy to design bespoke mobile landing experiences independent of a website’s desktop experience.

“Fluid Engine is the most cutting-edge, yet easy and fast way to build a website,” added Paul Gubay, Product Manager at Squarespace. “With millions of people creating professional and personal brands online, we’ve created a simplified solution – it’s as easy as creating a presentation and the results are amazing.”

While Squarespace’s beautifully designed templates and step-by-step layout options will remain available, users will have access to a whole new editing paradigm to explore through Fluid Engine. Combined with other recently released design tools, including a motion-based scroll block, curated font packs and color palettes, custom button styles, and more, the range of inline styling possibilities s is greatly expanded to enhance everyone’s creative vision.

Fluid Engine is now available on Squarespace 7.1 in English, with rollout plans for other supported languages ​​starting this fall.

To learn more about Fluid Engine and start designing today, click here.

About Squarespace

Squarespace is the all-in-one platform with everything to sell anything, giving customers in over 200 countries and territories all the tools they need to sell physical products, digital content, courses, appointments, reservations and more. Powered by best-in-class design for a consistent brand experience across all touchpoints, our suite of fully integrated products enables anyone to manage their projects and businesses across websites, domains, e-commerce, marketing tools and planning, as well as tools for managing a social media presence with Unfold and hotel business management via Tock. Squarespace is headquartered downtown New York Citywith offices at Dublin, Ireland, Portland, ORand Chicago, Ill.. For more information, visit www.squarespace.com.

Media
[email protected]

SOURCESquarespace, Inc.

]]>